Current Events

Virtue-signaling SJWs Taken At Their Word

The President of Princeton University thought he would do some progressive virtue-signaling by declaring his University to be systemically racist. Normally, this kind of self-flagellation is completely inconsequential. And that’s the point. The SJW gets to publicly demonstrate their WOKE! bona fides without actually doing anything of consequence or giving up any of their own alleged “privilege.” They show their virtue and receive their penance by admitting their sins publicly. But deep down they know it’s all bullshit.

Welp. The Federal Government decided to take this SJW at his word. The DOE is opening an investigation into this alleged racism at Princeton. Since they accept Federal funding, Princeton is required by law (1964 Civil Rights Act, Article VI) to not discriminate against anybody based on race. LOL, LOL, LOL!!! Now Mr. SJW has to explain to the Feds that his systemic racism accusations are all just a bunch of virtue-signaling hooey, or admit that his University has been defrauding the Federal Government for years. Absolutely delicious!

Portland Assassination

If you are ever wondering what the left is up to, just listen to what they are accusing you of doing…

Here we actually do have a case of a person being randomly assassinated for his political beliefs. While minding his own business, he was shot in the back in a despicably cowardly manner, and left to die in the street. Don’t expect the media to spend much time on that aspect of the story though, because the victim was a Trump supporter.

And the loving and tolerant peaceful protesters had about the reaction you would expect.

A Perspective on the Kenosha Shootings

Last Tuesday, 3 people were shot during a protest/riot in Kenosha, WI. Two of them fatally. The left and the media (BIRM) were quick to paint the incident as a violent white supremacist gunning down peaceful protesters in cold blood. Yet another example of dangerous right-wing extremists terrorizing noble activists seeking racial justice. Thanks to the obsessive impulse of the narcissistic turds who attend these riots to record their burning and looting sessions on their cellphones, we have a lot of video evidence of the incident. The video evidence does not support the narrative the left is pushing.

The Facts as We Know Them Today

The alleged shooter was 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse. Here is the criminal complaint filed against him.

Complaint-Criminal_1-Rittenhouse-Kyle-H-2020CF000983-Rittenhouse-Kyle-H._3753097_1

Videos show Rittenhouse being interviewed earlier in the evening. He talks about protecting the business he is standing in front of and helping people who have been injured. He claims to be a lifeguard with emergency medical training. He does not come across as angry or wanting a fight at this point.

This next video shows the shooter and all 3 victims at the same location before the violence started. It is clear that one of the eventual victims, Joseph Rosenbaum, is an aggressor at this point. However, his anger doesn’t seem to be directed at Rittenhouse yet.

The next video shows Rittenhouse fleeing down the street and into a parking lot with Rosenbaum giving chase. The first deadly confrontation ensues. It certainly appears that Rittenhouse is trying to get away from Rosenbaum who is chasing him. A single shot can be heard while the two men can still be seen running. The gunshot appears to come from another person following the chase who fires a handgun into the air. When Rosenbaum catches Rittenhouse at the far end of the parking lot, the 1st shooting occurs. This incident appears to be the source of the Count 1: Reckless Homicide (of Rosenbaum) and Count 2: Reckless Endangerment (of witness Richard McGinnis who was behind Rosenbaum when he was shot.)

The last video shows the 2nd and 3rd shootings. Rittenhouse is (apparently) fleeing an angry mob looking to exact some street justice after the 1st shooting. Rittenhouse eventually falls and ends up surrounded. An unidentified man runs up to Rittenhouse and delivers a flying kick to his head. Rittenhouse fired twice at the man and missed as he was flying towards him. This appears to be the source of Count 5: Reckless Endangerment (of an unknown individual.) Immediately afterword, Anthony Huber can be seen being shot once in the chest as he tries to smash Rittenhouse over the head with his skateborad. Rittenhouse was on his back at this point after receiving the drop kick. This is the source of Count 3: First Degree Intentional Homicide (against Huber.) Rittenhouse then points his rifle at Gaige Grosskreutz, who was charging at him. Grosskreutz stops short and shows his hands which are empty. Grosskreutz then slowly circles around Rittenhouse who stays focused on him. Grosskreutz reaches back with his right hand and produces a Glock pistol, at which point Rittenhouse fires his rifle once hitting Grosskreutz in the right elbow. This seems to be the basis for Count 4: Attempted First Degree Intentional Homicide (of Grosskreutz.)

An additional weapons charge was also filed (Count 6: Possession of a Dangerous Weapon by a Person Under 18.)

My Takeaways

Tons of people have already dissected these videos frame-by-frame, so I won’t bother doing that. I do have some overall thougts…

  • First, it is obvious to anybody who watches these clips with an open mind that Rittenhouse was not indiscriminately murdering people. He tried to run away from both confrontations but was unable to escape. He didn’t fire his weapon at anybody that wasn’t actively attacking him. He didn’t shoot Rosenbaum until he was virtually on top of him. I would even go so far as to say he displayed remarkable restraint in the confrontation with Grosskreutz. I believe most people being attacked from multiple directions would have instinctively fired at the guy charging at them at such close distance. Grosskreutz could have easily retreated after he stopped short, but chose to circle around and draw a pistol instead.
  • I personally think the criminal charges related to the 2nd confrontation are ridiculous. A clearer case of self defense would be hard to imagine. My bet would be they were filed just to placate the mob. The attempted murder charge related to Grosskreutz is especially bizarre, since Rittenhouse could have easily killed him if that was his intention and it would have been justifiable.
  • My gut instinct is the 1st confrontation was also a justifiable case of self defense. It’s a little more murky because you can’t really see exactly what happened in the video, and Rosenbaum wasn’t armed. Hopefully, more evidence will come out which will provide context about how and why Rosenbaum was giving chase, and whether Rittenhouse could reasonably have feared death or great bodily harm.
  • It is worth noting that all 3 victims had criminal records. Rosenbaum appears to have spent a good chunk of his adult life in prison for sexually assaulting a minor. The other 2 victims also had criminal records and a past history of violence. To be perfectly clear, this does not mean they deserved to be shot down in the street. But it does indicate the kind of people who show up to these riots. I’m betting they were much more interested in violence and destruction than affirming the “value, dignity, and worth of Black lives.”
  • Given what we know today, I don’t believe Rittenhouse did anything wrong as far as the shootings go. His huge mistake was inserting himself into that situation in the first place. I honestly think he went in with noble intentions, but naively got in way over his head. I don’t believe he wanted to shoot anybody, and it is grossly unfair to make him out as some kind of white supremacist domestic terrorist.
  • Rittenhouse is only 17 years old. As the father of a teenage boy, I can’t imagine allowing my child to go into a riot zone. This seems like an epic parenting fail.
  • There are some hard core criminals at these riots. Just showing up with a weapon won’t deter them from attacking you. Don’t even think about confronting these people with a weapon if you aren’t prepared to actually use it. And face the legal consequences if things go wrong.
  • This was a tragedy all around. There are no winners. Rittenhouse could be facing life in prison. Even if he is eventually found to have acted in self-defense, his whole life will be forever altered. I confess to not having too much sympathy for the rioters. I do, however, have great sympathy for their families and loved ones that have suffered a loss.
  • To me, the real villains in this story are the Mayor of Kenosha and the Governor of Wisconsin. Their fecklessness led to ordinary citizens having to protect their community from out-of-town criminal mobs. It was almost inevitable something like this was going to happen. If trained, equipped, and organized law enforcement and National Guardsmen had been allowed to do their jobs, none of this would have ever happened.

Watch: BLM Activists Harass and Intimidate RNC Attendees

Stay classy, Democrats!

Attendees of the Republican National Convention were harassed and threatened by deranged BLM “activists” as they were leaving the White House on Thursday night. Democratic mayors and governors across the country have shown zero interest in reining in the violence that is taking over their streets. The thugs and criminals behind it all, along with their useful idiots, are becoming more emboldened by the day. These animals unleash this seething hatred with a clear conscience. The Democrats and their enablers in the media have convinced them they are actually the good guys in this story. My advice: buy guns and ammo. This could get really ugly.

BLM Bonus Coverage!

Apparently the BLM shock troops have revived an oldie but a goodie: Chairman Mao’s Struggle Sessions. There really is nothing new under the sun with these cretins.

Ultimate Own Goal?

Sometimes, ya gotta wonder whether The Donald really is a stable genius… His ability to get the liberal media to beclown themselves is seemingly unlimited. The latest example is the standard cognitive test Trump took and described as “very hard.” Whether he really believes this or not is up for debate. But liberals have been smugly mocking the test publicly for a week now. Pretty much all the lefly talking heads are on record dismissing it as childishly easy and crowing about what a buffoon Trump is for making a big deal about it. Now guess who’s preferred candidate has a really good chance of failing it?

Get ready for relentless taunting of Sleepy Joe to take the test. Stable genius? More likely a media so consumed with TDS they can’t see straight.

The SJW War on “Whiteness”

The Smithsonian Museum of African American History and Culture posted a chart describing characteristics of “Whiteness.” The chart has since been removed, but the site is still dripping with Critical Race Theory nonsense. If you thought that a museum would be focused on preserving history and not pushing Marxist social theories, you would be sadly mistaken.

They key thing to understand about this chart is that it isn’t some fringe theory or obscure reference. This is boilerplate Critical Race Theory, which the far left has fully embraced and the Democratic Party is currently adopting. This is a definition of “whiteness” any SJW could easily recognize and agree to. And according to Critical Race Theory, “whiteness” is the embodiment of systemic racism that allegedly perpetuates white supremacy. When the left talks about dismantling “systemic racism”, these are the kinds of traditions and values they are really talking about stamping out. Even if the suburban high-school kids protesting in their BLM shirts don’t realize it.

Trump Jr. perfectly summed up the reaction I think most people had to the chart:

Of course he is 100% right. These are the principles and values that have drawn immigrants of all races here for generations to make better lives for themselves. Living these values is the key to achieving the American Dream, and avoiding poverty and despair. Encouraging people to reject them just seems cruel.

Cancel Culture is Out of Control

This story out of Walled Lake Western high school is literally unbelievable. A popular AP history teacher and baseball coach has allegedly been terminated for an offensive post on Twitter. Here is the offending post.

I though this had to be a joke. Surely nobody gets fired for stating an incontrovertible fact and expressing tepid support for the sitting US President, right? How could such an innocuous statement be grounds for firing? Well, the response to this Tweet in the comments was nothing short of astounding. Mr. Kucera was accused of: intentionally instilling fear in black and immigrant students; supporting racism, sexism, and homophobia; enabling sexual predators; and failing to see the similarities between the United States and 1930’s Germany, among many other lurid things. The hatred directed at any person willing to publicly support Donald Trump was palpable. I was going to highlight some of the more unhinged examples, but I’m not sure which are high school students and which are adults.

Cancel culture has to be the absolute worst development of the social media age. Online mobs have found they can ruin the lives of random strangers for the most trivial slights. And they can do it without even having to get off the couch. Some do it to intimidate their political rivals into silence. Some do it to virtue signal. And some seem to do it just for kicks. A group of liberals, most likely sensing the beast they helped create was out of control and ready to turn on them, recently signed an open letter denouncing cancel culture. Alas, that Genie is already out of the bottle. I hope this insanity comes to an end, but I see no reason to be optimistic it will stop any time soon.

Post Script

Somebody in the comments posted a screen shot of a second tweet that was allegedly deleted. It’s at least mildly offensive, I guess. But if this is the bar we are setting for firing offenses, there aren’t going to be very many teachers left. (Note: it looks pretty legit, but screen shots are ridiculously easy to fake.)

Anti-Racist Racism

American progressives are completely losing their minds. After the George Floyd killing, liberals have fully bought in to the fiction that America is a deeply racist county where young black men are regularly hunted and killed by the police. The asinine Critical Race Theory that so many students have wasted tuition money studying is starting to have real world consequences. If you don’t know what Critical Race Theory is all about, this website explains it better than I ever could. In a nutshell, it’s Marxist claptrap applied to race.

After their Russia Collusion Hoax imploded, the New York Times decided to go all in on the racism narrative. So it comes as no surprise they are gleefully pushing this new “woke” view of race relations. Their 1619 Project is an attempt to rewrite American history through the lens of Critical Race Theory. The Times recently highlighted a Minneapolis neighborhood, Powderhorn Park, that has vowed to stop using the police as an example of how all decent people should now be thinking. The article explores how residents are struggling with their “wokeness” now that a pack of homeless people have established a tent camp in their collective backyard. Almost every sentence is a howler.

But times have changed. After the death of George Floyd at the hands of the police, Ms. Albers, who is white, and many of her progressive neighbors have vowed to avoid calling law enforcement into their community. Doing so, they believed, would add to the pain that black residents of Minneapolis were feeling and could put them in danger.

The first thing you notice while reading the article is how obsessively fixated on race the author is. Nobody’s opinion or perspective matters without the context of race to color it. The author makes sure the race of every person cited or discussed is clearly made known so you know how to feel about them. Critical Race Theory and the left have taken the dream of Dr. King and one of the fundamental American values and turned it on it’s head. According to the SJWs, now it is racist not to factor skin tone into how we see each other.

The multiracial group of roughly 300 new residents seems to grow larger and more entrenched every day. They do laundry, listen to music and strategize about how to find permanent housing.

So, basically, the homeless mob is trashing a neighborhood they don’t give two craps about while being loud and obnoxious. The story fails to mention the sanitation and hygiene situation. That part is left up to the imagination. Oh, and they also “strategize.”

Their presence has drawn heavy car traffic into the neighborhood, some from drug dealers. At least two residents have overdosed in the encampment and had to be taken away in ambulances.

Of course.

The video of Mr. Floyd’s death and the outcry over racial injustice that came after has awakened many white Americans to a reality that people of color have known their whole lives: The scores of police killings they have seen in the news in recent years were not one-off incidents, but part of a systemic problem of the dehumanization of black people by the police.

This is the big lie foisted to justify this nonsense. Numerous studies have failed to identify a racial bias in police shootings. But BLM is willing to burn down buildings, so apparently that means they must automatically be taken seriously. So instead of calling the cops, the Powderhorn Park residents think of ways to one-up their neighbors in coddling the squatters. Being woke isn’t always easy though…

“I’m not being judgmental,” said Carrie Nightshade, 44, who explained that she no longer felt comfortable letting her children, 12 and 9, play in the park by themselves. “It’s not personal. It’s just not safe.”

You can almost feel the anguish.

Angelina Roslik burst into tears, explaining that she had spent the past four years fleeing unstable housing conditions and was struggling more than she cared to admit with the chaos the camp had brought into the neighborhood. Linnea Borden said she had stopped walking her dog through the park because she was tired of being catcalled.

Sounds like someone’s White Fragility is showing!

The women agreed to let any property damage, including to their own homes, go ignored and to request a block party permit from the city to limit car traffic. Rather than turn to law enforcement if they saw anyone in physical danger, they resolved to call the American Indian Movement 

So your home and property get trashed. And maybe your neighborhood is no longer safe. It’s a small price to pay for the smug satisfaction that “wokeness” provides, right?

The impulse many white Powderhorn Park residents have to seek help from community groups rather than from the police is being felt in neighborhoods across the country. 

Is it really? Are neighborhoods all across the country seriously considering replacing their police with community groups? Seems like the NYT is desperate to make this a thing, and not just a handful of hard left loons making a ridiculous gesture to prove how “woke” they are.

Ms. Miller came to see her decision to buy a home in the neighborhood as potentially preventing a person of color from doing so. And while Ms. Albers used to feel only pride about the work she put in to revitalizing the community, now, she sees her work as gentrification that may have pushed out nonwhite residents.

Seems that these white women are feeling guilty about their very existence. Because the act of merely taking up space on the planet might be causing inconvenience to some hypothetical person of color. And apparently thinking that fixing a neighborhood up and eliminating crime would tend to drive out nonwhite people is not at all racist when you are Woke.

She worries that a lot of what has been written about the camp on community message boards has been influenced by racial profiling. To the extent that illegal activity is going on in the park, Ms. Miller does not blame the tent residents. “My feeling around it is those are symptoms of systemic oppression,” she said. “And that’s not on them.”

That is some professional grade virtue signaling. Her neighborhood is being destroyed by criminals, and her only worry is they might be getting a bad rap on social media. Woke! Surely nobody could top that?

Mitchell Erickson’s fingers began dialing 911 last week before he had a chance to even consider alternatives, when two black teenagers who looked to be 15, at most, cornered him outside his home a block away from the park. One of the boys pointed a gun at Mr. Erickson’s chest, demanding his car keys…

“I regret calling the police. It was my instinct but I wish it hadn’t been. I put those boys in danger of death by calling the cops.”

This guy takes virtue signaling to Twilight Zone levels. After being car-jacked at gun point, his main regret is calling the police because a carjacker might have gotten hurt. Dude deserves SJW Sainthood. Too bad Critical Race Theory still condemns him as hopelessly racist.

Postscript on the Inevitable Consequences

Well, that didn’t take long. A child was sexually assaulted in the homeless encampment on Thursday. But it seems the Powderhorn Park gang is sticking by their lunacy for the time being. The child was taken to the hospital, but nobody ever called the police. Apparently, sacrificing your children to predators is a small price to pay for not being branded as racist to this crowd.

Honestly, this is sick.

The End of the CHAZ?

The Seattle CHAZ/CHOP looks set to come to an inglorious end. Promoted as an example of how communal living could replace the evils of capitalism and lead to a more just society, the CHAZ never quite lived up to it’s billing. Apparently, rebuilding civilization from the ground up is a little more difficult than these dipshits were lead to believe by their college professors.

The garden is certainly one of the more hilarious examples of how cutting edge the CHAZ was. The creators of the CHAZ garden must have gone to the Michael Bloomberg school of farming because it was brilliant. They dumped some (most likely stolen) top soil on top of a plot of grass, inserted some potted plants, and voila, food autonomy! Sadly, the CHAZ garden of Eden was destroyed by some homeless dude before it could feed the masses.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIqLbHHYQr4

The “summer of love” was turning out to be a Utopian dream of peace and unity with the villainous Seattle PD finally vanquished. And where there wasn’t total harmony, the statesmen of the CHAZ were finding more civilized and sophisticated methods of resolving their differences.

However, the “block party” the mayor was gushing over only days before seems to have lost some of it’s luster after a spate of violence including beatings, sexual assaults, and a handful of shootings. Somehow, despite responsibly ensuring the CHAZ security force was adequately armed with AR-15 rifles, there was an unfortunate fatality in the zone.

Gotta admit that blaming the police for the ensuing chaos was a level of chutzpah even I didn’t expect. Apparently SPD, which the CHAZ wants to abolish and pelted with bricks, was suddenly responsible for the autonomous zone again… even though armed men were preventing them from securing the crime scene.

No longer wanting to remain autonomous and selfishly deprive the country of their monumental talent, the Free Capitol Hill brain trust is offering to rejoin American society. Their list of demands to grace us with their return are a wonder to behold. Surely the eternal truths so eloquently stated by these cretins will find their rightful place in our shared history alongside the words of Jefferson and Lincoln. Yet, alas, they are ahead of their time. For now, the legacy of the CHAZ colonizers will be broken windows, graffiti and filth everywhere, and businesses fleeing the city for good. Seems that playtime is over in the CHAZ. Now the adults are expected to come in and clean up the mess.