How hard is the government looking for election fraud? Really, really hard! The video below is allegedly from Antrim county, Michigan. The counters have come across multiple ballots with the exact same signature. They inform the election official that they suspect fraud, and wish to challenge those ballots. Or at least flag them and set them aside to be evaluated further at a later time. They are basically told to just count all the ballots they are given and completely ignore any irregularities they might observe. That way, the election officials can finish their “audit” and find out “how many ballots we have” and “move forward.” When asked by the counters if they will have an opportunity to challenge the ballots later, the official replies “I don’t know if challenge is the right word” but assures them their concerns are duly noted. If there is a good explanation for this, I would love to hear it. It sure seems like the election officials, who have now turned into election auditors (clown nose off/clown nose on), are much more interested in CYA than actual auditing of their own work. What a shock.
When these people say we had the most secure election in history, I tend to believe them. And when they announce that they haven’t uncovered a hint of election fraud, then that should be the end of it. Right? After all, who is more deserving of blind trust than the government?